Your 1st for Philippine Defense

Austal leads Philippine Navy's OPV Acquisition Project!

SecDef Lorenzana confirms Austal is still the preferred OPV supplier for the PN

The Philippine Navy commissions its 2nd Jose Rizal-class frigate!

The Philippine Navy welcomes BRP Antonio Luna (FF-151), its newest frigate!

The Philippine Navy selects Shaldag Mk. V for Fast Attack Interdiction Craft!

The DND has awarded the FAIC-M Acquisition Project to Israel Shipyards

The Philippine Air Force wants more Black Hawk helicopters!

The Philippine Air Force asks for more Black Hawks to allow the retirement of their Bell UH-1 Huey fleet

The Philippine Army orders the Sabrah Light Tank System from Israel!

Israel's Elbit Systems was declared the winner to supply light tanks to the PA

The Philippine Air Force receives full order of Hermes 900 and Hermes 450 UAVs!

All 9 Hermes 900 and 4 Hermes 450 MALE UAVs have been received by the PAF!


Friday, July 19, 2013

Why the Hamilton-class WHECs are still worth purchasing for the Philippine Navy.

There has been a lot of comments in the press, the internet, and even on discussions with defense and government officials opposing the Philippine government's decision to purchase 40-year old Hamilton-class patrol vessels from the US Coast Guard to upgrade the capabilities of the Philippine Navy. Here at MaxDefense blog alone, readers can see the views of some posters rejecting the ships. 

But is purchasing the ships really not worth it? 

Let us discuss the pros and cons of the ship with regards to its use with the Philippine Navy, starting with the cons.

CONS:
These are the most common reasons why people are against the purchase of the Hamilton-class ships for the Philippine Navy:

1. "The ships are too old and are replaced with newer ships by the US Coast Guard". 


USCGC Rush before the FRAM upgrades. Taken during Exercise Brim Frost 1985. Notice the missing telescopic hangar, and Phalanx CIWS at the fantail, and the use of the older 5" gun.
Photo taken from Wikipedia.
Looking at the ship class' history, the Hamilton-class cutters are actually designed in the early 1960's, with the first ship, USCGC Hamilton (WHEC-715) , now known as BRP Gregorio del Pilar (PF-15), being launched in 1965 and commissioned with the US Coast Guard in 1967. That makes the ship 48 years old from launching. That even makes the ship probably older than the ship's current commanding officer (am I right Capt.Cruz & Cmdr. Orbe?)  Due to old age, the US Coast Guard started replacing the class with the new National Security Cutter a.k.a. Legend-class cutters, and the decommissioned units were sold to the Philippines, Nigeria, and recently to Bangladesh. Due to old age, wear and tear of its parts and degradation of the hull and systems are expected to happen. Compared to newer ships they become more susceptible to frequent maintenance requirements, frequent and longer dock time and reduced operational capability.


2. "These ships were heavily used by the US Coast Guard in their high seas operation".


The USCGC Mellon operating on high sea states. The WHECs were reportedly driven hard by the US Coast Guard to achieve their missions in high sea states and different conditions around the world that even navy ships do not dare to go.
Photo taken from USCG website.

The US Coast Guard heavily used the Hamilton-class cutters as these are their most capable and longest-ranged ships in the service. They were everywhere around the world during the 40+ years in service, from the icy waters of the Bering Strait to the tropical waters of the Caribbean.  The Hamiltons were even used by the USCG in sea control, escort and shore bombardment duties from the Vietnam War until the South Ossetia War. Due to their design to perform well in the high seas, they are also the preferred platform on high sea state operations if required by the USCG.


3. "They do not have the necessary sensors and weapons systems a normal modern frigate has".
Before transferring to friendly countries like the Philippines, the US government removed the ship's AN/SPS-40 air search radar, the AN/SPS-73 surface search radar, communications systems and links used by US military forces, the 2 Mk. 38 Mod. 0 chain guns, and the Mk. 15 Phalanx close-in weapons system. The US government claims that the weapons will be used for their incoming Legend-class and other USCG ships, while the radar and communications systems will be used as spares for their remaining Hamilton-class ships in USCG service. The recipient countries bought a new radar system to replace the surface search and navigation radar and necessary safety equipment as a basic requirement for normal sea travel.


The BRP Gregorio del Pilar was only armed with the Oto Melara 76mm gun when handed-over to the Philippine Navy.
Photo from BRP Gregorio del Pilar PF-15 Facebook page.

4. "They won't stand a chance against OPFOR naval forces".
With only a 76mm gun plus light weapons, it won't stand a chance should OPFOR decided to use force against the ship. It does not have the offensive power to strike OPFOR ships, aircraft and submarines, and except for the main gun, it does not have the hard-kill systems to defend against anti-ship missiles and soft-kill systems to avoid torpedoes. It does not even have the capability to detect incoming threats from a longer distance as compared to its American sister-ships.


The PN needs more capable warships and naval assets to protect the country's EEZ and territory from OPFOR threats, like this fleet.
Photo taken from sina.com

5. "There are a lot more naval ships on offer abroad, why settle for the Hamilton-class?"
Currently there a number of frigates being offered in the used market, with the well-known Maestrale and Soldati classes from the Italians, the Oliver Hazard Perry-class from the Americans, the F122 Bremen-class from the Germans, and others. These are even younger and more capable than the Hamilton-class cutters, with a more comprehensive offensive and defensive weapons, sensors and detection systems, and were built according to Milspec.
The Italians offered the Maestrale-class frigates before, as discussed in previous MaxDefense blogs.
Photo taken from Wikimedia.


But also there are positive reasons on why the Philippine Navy decided to get the Hamilton-class ships:


PROS:

1. The Philippine Navy needs to acquire as many large-hull warships it can possibly get, operate and maintain with its limited budget.
The PN is currently experiencing shortage of capable ships of all sizes, and before the PF-15 was commissioned in 2011 there was only 1 gun frigate in service. Several old warships were decommissioned without replacement in the past. The PN needs to have more ships to show its presence and patrol the vast Philippine territorial and EEZ waters. The Hamilton-class was an opportunity that the PN saw, and now the BRP Gregorio del Pilar has been a big boost to the capability of the PN even if it's just 1 ship. If there are more used warships available in the market and the PN has the budget to purchase more, it must use the chance and do so. The BRP Gregorio del Pilar was funded with a 2 years operational budget worth Php 120 million when it was purchased to make sure that it won't get stuck at port due to lack of funds.


2. Despite its age, the Hamilton-class ships are definitely younger, more capable, and have better seakeeping than 3 major ship classes of the Philippine Navy which are from the 1940s era.
Before the Gregorio del Pilar arrived, the PN's 3 largest surface warships are 70-year old World War 2 veterans, the BRP Rajah Humabon (PF-11), the BRP Quezon (PS-70) and BRP Rizal (PS-74). There are also 6 more World War 2 veteran patrol vessels with the PN. Due to old age, these ships should have already been withdrawn from service by now. They do not have the weapons and systems currently being used in other navies, limiting the increase of technological skills and knowledge of ship crews and of the PN organization as a whole. Stories of the Oto Melara 76mm gun breakdown of the Jacinto-class ships and the lack of skilled specialists in the PN organization are abound on the internet, and all are attributed to the lack of modern equipment to train with in the PN's inventory. 


The Gregorio del Pilar-class frigates are definitely younger than the BRP Rajah Humabon.
Photo taken from US Navy c/o Wikimedia.
But the Gregorio del Pilar, despite its "old age" as compared to naval assets being used by neighboring countries, is 30 years younger than the PN's largest warships. It is also larger and can operate on higher sea states than most if not all PN warships, has one of the best endurance at sea than most comparable frigate and patrol vessels (both new and old), and has superior seakeeping. Despite its age, it also has the capability to accept modern ship systems, as discussed further in this blog. 

Of course they're old! If not they won't be even sold by the US government right? We must also consider the fact that all frigates in the used market are old, so the WHECs are not the only ships holding that distinction. You won't see slightly used frigates being sold elsewhere. Proper and thorough inspection of the ships can give the PN a better chance of only getting what it thinks is best for their specifications and requirements.


3. The Hamilton-class ships were sold to the Philippines at a very low price.
The BRP Gregorio del Pilar (PF-15) only costed the Philippine government Php 450 million (more than $10M as of 2011)  for the ship, crew training, and refurbishment & minor repair works. An additional amount was spent to drydock the ship in the Philippines prior to commissioning. The BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF-16) was also purchase for the same amount, although an additional $ 5 million was spent for the repair works and engine replacement. For the 2 ships the government only spent less than $30 million. That is around more than half of a single Maestrale-class frigate without training and refurbishing works when Italy offered one to a South American country in 2009. Or just less than the price of a single KAI FA-50 Golden Eagle being offered to the Philippine Air Force. 

Imagine how many WHECs you can buy with the missing Php 10 billion PDAF "pork barrel" that is in the local news right now.


In comparison, the cost to purchase the 2 Hamilton-class WHECs is even less than a new FA-50 LIFT aircraft being offered to the PAF.

For a cash-strapped navy like the PN, this is already a very good bargain. Even Nigeria is contemplating getting another unit, and Bangladesh now joining the fray. Even in its current state as a large OPV, there is almost nothing in the used market right now that can offer the same deal for that price.


4. The Hamilton-class ships has the basic modern technology the Philippine Navy needs to train its personnel, and has the size to install current and future weapons and sensors to keep it up-to-date for another decade.
The Gregorio del Pilar has brought with it a lot of new capabilities to the PN when it was commissioned in 2011. It is equipped with a CODOG propulsion system, and became the first ship in the PN's history to have gas turbines as part of the propulsion. It is equipped with a "current technology" Oto Melara 76mm Compact gun, making it the 4th ship in the PN's inventory to have it, and despite the removal by the US of its original radar systems, the PF-15 has new navigation and surface search radar and a new C&C/Common Operational Picture system. It also has a helicopter hangar and helideck for shipborne helicopter operations, and provisions for new radar and communications systems if the PN decides to install. Provisions are also available to install Harpoon anti-ship missiles, Mk. 15 Phalanx CIWS or SeaRAM on the fantail, Mk. 38 25mm chain guns on the midships, a hull-mounted sonar (needs further modifications) and even torpedo launchers. 


The WHECs have already proven that they are capable of accepting additional systems to increase its capability. Seen here is the USCGC Mellon carrying Harpoon missiles and a Mk. 15 Phalanx CIWS after the FRAM program. Not shown are the torpedo launchers for Mk.46 torpedoes and the AN/SQS-26 hull mounted sonar. Photo taken from Wikimedia.

There are already plans to up-arm and upgrade the Gregorio del Pilar-class, with both ships to be installed with Coast Watch links, and reportedly, with a new 3D search radar, the Harpoon missile, the Mk. 38 Mod. 2 Typhoon 25mm chain guns, an AW-109 Power shipboard helicopter, and anti-submarine warfare capability. Of all current PN assets, only the Gregorio del Pilar-class has the space and size to receive systems that require large space and power requirements.


5. The Hamilton-class ships are readily available, and can be put to sea in a shorter span of time than most used frigates in the market.
Although the PN took more than a year to bring the BRP Ramon Alcaraz to service due to "overlooked" repair works, the cycle from purchase to commissioning is still faster than if buying other frigates. The BRP Gregorio del Pilar only took a few months from hand-over to commissioning. Due to the complexity of other used frigates, the PN may not be able to bring these more capable ships to sea immediately as it needs more time to train. The Hamilton-class ships are much simpler, and will be easy for the PN to assimilate into its fleet and capability.



MaxDefense believes that in general the Hamilton-class ships were a good buy for the Philippine Navy despite the negative issues ships, the positive outweighs the negative concerns. It is a better platform than the ageing naval assets of the PN that negatively affects their capability considering the limitations of their current assets. As an interim platform, the ships will be able to provide the Philippine Navy with capable ships at sea to immediately do its mandate of protecting its interests and territories even with limited capability. Anyway it is not expected that a shooting war will happen anytime soon if political arrangements are properly utilized in the absence of armed capability.

The Gregorio del Pilar-class frigates are expected to be in service with the PN for another decade, but the PN must not be complacent and rely too much on these ships. The cons issues posted above still hold true, and the PN must be able to plan its course of actions to move ahead further and not getting stuck with the WHECs. Purchasing brand new and more capable frigates is a good way to start, which the DND and PN are expected to release the details soon. At the mean time, MaxDefense suggests getting more WHECs from the US government using the same deal (or better) when it took the PF-15 and PF-16. The USCG is expected to release more WHECs every year, with another expected within this year.


More WHECs, more happy sailors seeing their organization upgrading and moving away from World War 2 era vintage warships.
Photo taken from Timawa.net

MaxDefense will be updating this blog later on (expect edits on this blog).

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

More Photos from BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF-16)'s Hawaii Port Call (12-16 July 2013)

The Philippine Navy's latest frigate, the BRP Ramon Alcaraz, is ending its scheduled port call at Joint Base Pearl Harbor - Hickam in Hawaii later on the Hawaiian morning of 16 July 2013 after staying for 4 days. It has been replenished and refueled to continue its journey to its next port call in Guam until it reaches Manila by 2 August 2013.

The last 4 days saw the ship's crew attending different functions and activities, as shown on the photos posted here at MaxDefense.

The BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF-16) as it approaches Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam on 12 July 2013.
Photo taken from Shipspotting.com, photo by WadeArmstrong.

A photo taken from the PF-16 preparing to dock at Pearl Harbon on 12 July 2013.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.

Joint Base Pearl Harbor - Hickam Base Commander, Capt. Jesse James, welcomes the BRP Ramon Alcaraz officers upon arrival.
Photo taken from Philippine Navy website BRP Alcaraz blog.


Consul Roberto T. Bernardo delivering the opening speech for the PF-16's welcome party on 12 July 2013.
Photo taken from Philippine Navy website BRP Alcaraz blog.
A hula dance performance during the welcome party from representative of the Filipino-American Community in Hawaii.
Photo taken from Philippine Navy website BRP Alcaraz blog.

Members of the Filipino-American Community in Hawaii enjoying the presence of the BRP Ramon Alcaraz in Hawaii.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.

The BRP Ramon Alcaraz's main gun just after sunset on 12 July 2013.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz facebook page.


The crew of BRP Ramon Alcaraz visiting the USS Arizona Memorial in Hawaii. They paid tribute to the sacrifices of the fallen crew of USS Arizona.
Taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.


During the stay in Hawaii, 5 enlisted crew members of the ship have made an Oath of Re-Enlistment for another 3 years of military service. The following crew members are:
- EN2 Regidor Labrador
- EN3 Tomas Ciruelos, Jr.
- EN3 Ernesto Cabahug
- S2YN Erica Celemin
- EN3 Marlon Martonito

5 enlisted personnel of the BRP Ramon Alcaraz taking their Oath of Re-enlistment rites for another 3 years of naval service. Presiding the oath is PF-16 commanding officer Capt. Ernesto Baldovino.
Taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.  



The crew of BRP Ramon Alcaraz doing replenishment and final checks in preparation for its departure from Hawaii to continue its journey.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.

Good morning Hawaii, July 16, 2013.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page
.
The ship's officers discussing the activities of the morning, July 16, 2013.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.

Pre-departure Catholic Mass held at the ship's helideck, with the base chaplain leading the ceremonies.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.

AFP Liaison Officer to the US Pacific Command, Col. Restituto Padilla, PAF with Consul Roberto Bernardo.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.


Visitors enjoying the "despedida" party meal before the ship's departure from Hawaii, July 16, 2013.
Photo taken from PF-16 Ramon Alcaraz Facebook page.


MaxDefense will post updates on the ship's journey and its next port call in Guam, which the ship is expected to arrive there by next week. Wishing the ship and crew a safe and problem-free journey.

For more on the ship's journey, you may also refer to the official navy sites:

* Facebook page of BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF-16): https://www.facebook.com/pages/PF-16-Ramon-Alcaraz/533450743369095?fref=ts

* Philippine Navy's BRP Alcaraz blogs: http://www.navy.mil.ph/alcaraz/



Saturday, July 13, 2013

BRP Ramon Alcaraz Reaches Hawaii, Docks at Pearl Harbor (12 July 2013)

The BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF-16) entering Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Friday morning 12 July 2013.
Photo taken from Navy Region Hawaii Facebook page.

The Philippine Navy frigate BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PF-16) has reached Hawaii on the morning of 12 July 2013 (Honolulu time) and docked at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. This is the second port call for the ship on its travel to the Philippines, with the first port call 2,400 miles away in San Diego Naval Base, California last June 28. The ship was greeted at the pier by the Filipino-American community in Hawaii.

 
PF-16 preparing to dock at Pearl Harbor.
Photo taken from Navy Region Hawaii Facebook page.

Filipino-American community in Hawaii awaiting for PF-16 to dock.
Photo taken from Navy Region Hawaii Facebook page.

During her stay in Hawaii, the ship will be refueled, re-provisioned and re-supplied as confirmed by the Philippine Navy. The ship will be open to US Department of Defense (DOD) cardholders during the weekend 13-14 July 2013 from 9:00am to 5:00pm. The ship is also expected to be opened to the Filipino-American community, and the ship's crew are scheduled to participate in social activities prepared by the local community. 




Top: The ship's crew receiving welcome flower necklace (Lei) from the Fil-Am community.
Mid: Ship's crew marching to formation with a Fil-Am carrying the Philippine flag in the foreground.
Bottom: PF-16's crew in formation after receiving leis from the Fil-Am community.
Photos taken from Navy Region Hawaii Facebook page.

She will be staying in Hawaii for a few days before continuing her journey to her scheduled 3rd port call in Guam before finally heading to Manila and arrive by early August 2013. 

MaxDefense will update you on the ship's activities in Hawaii and its journey to the Philippines.



Thursday, July 11, 2013

The PAF OV-10 Replacement - Possible Candidates (2nd of 2 parts)

Last time we discussed a short history of the Rockwell OV-10 Bronco in service with the Philippine Air Force's 15th Strike Wing. As the premier ground support / strike aircraft of the PAF, the OV-10 has shown great versatility and importance in conducting PAF's mandate in support of the entire armed forces. But like all other good assets that come and go, the OV-10 is already at the edge of its "extended" service life.


The Rockwell OV-10 Bronco is expected to be replaced soon in the Philippine Air Force after more than 20 years in service. 

Plans to replace the type due to old age and difficulty in maintenance and underway for some years now, but implementation has not been done due to funding concerns. But with the Aquino administration's drive to modernize the armed forces including the PAF, the OV-10's replacement is back on the sights as well. 

MaxDefense will discuss possible replacement models that are expected to be in the PAF's shortlist. Take note that THIS IS NOT THE ACTUAL LISTING, but is MaxDefense' expected candidates:


1. Korea Aerospace Industries KA-1 Woongbi (South Korea)

The KAI KA-1 Woongbi is an armed variant of the original KT-1 trainer aircraft. It can be used for light attack missions, forward air control, as well as basic and advanced flight training missions. The KA-1 is currently used by the air forces of South Korea and Peru although the KT-1 trainer variant is also used by Turkey and Indonesia.


A pair of KAI KA-1 Woongbi of the RoKAF.
Photo taken from Nemopan.com

Due to the PAF's choice of its stablemate FA-50 Golden Eagle for its LIFT/LCA requirement, the KA-1 has an added advantage with regards to corporate positioning. Korea and KAI has previously given very good pricing to the Philippine military with its products. But the armed variant has not been proven in combat by its 2 users.


2. Hawker Beechcraft AT-6 Texan II (USA)

The AT-6 Texan II is an armed variant of the T-6 trainer aircraft made by Beechcraft. It has similar concept as the KA-1 Woongbi, and almost similar capability. The T-6 is used by several armed forces including the US Air Force and Navy, Israel, Greece, Germany, and many others. 


The Hawker Beechcraft AT-6 Texan II.
Photo taken from DefenseTech.org

Despite the trainer variant being widely used and proven with several hundreds delivered, the AT-6 variant is not in use by any armed forces, making it an unproven variant. Also, it may not be qualified if standard bidding procedures are to be used to purchase aircraft under this program due to Philippine legal requirements on number of users.

The AT-6 joined the US Air Force's bid for the Light Attack/Armed Reconnaissance (LAAR) project and was projected to be the strongest competitor, but it lost out to the A-29 Super Tucano. Hawker Beechcraft also sent one AT-6 together with other aircraft to Clark Air Base in April 2012, as part of its product roadshow.


3. Embraer EMB-314 Super Tucano (Brazil)

Of all the possible competitors for the OV-10 replacement, the EMB-314 Super Tucano holds the distinction of being the most proven, chosen by the most number of air forces, and the most developed for light armed missions. It was developed from the older EMB-312 Tucano, which was also a successful aircraft. The Super Tucano is used extensively by Brazil, and is also chosen by Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and recently by Indonesia. Also being picked by the US Air Force for its LAAR program (as the A-29) is a big boost for the aircraft.


A pair of Embraer EMB-314 Super Tucanos of the Brazilian Air Force.

Extensive usage for attack missions by both the Brazilian and Colombian air forces have shown its capabilities, and Brazil even uses it for low intensity air policing duties and border patrols.

Also, the EMB-314 has been initially announced by the DND and PAF as their top pick, although there is no finality yet on the OV-10 replacement program. But that gives the aircraft an extra advantage in the project awarding.


4. Aero L-159 ALCA (Czech Republic)

The L-159 ALCA  (Advanced Light Combat Aircraft) is the latest iteration of the L-39 Albatross advance jet trainer that was previously pitched to the PAF in the early 1990s. It comes in 2 versions, the single-seat L-159A which is currently available, and the two-seat L-159B, which is still in the prototype stage. The two-seat version was reportedly pitched by the Czech government to the PAF before for the LIFT/SAA project.


A flight of Aero L-159A ALCA of the Czech Air Force.

As a jet-powered aircraft, its advantages is speed and its ability to conduct combat duties similar to the future LIFT/SAA aircraft of the PAF, the KAI F/A-50 Golden Eagle (actually the ALCA's combat performance may be nearer to the capabilities of the T/A-50). But for missions like those conducted by the OV-10 that require endurance and slower speeds, the ALCA's high speed would be a disadvantage. Also, being a single-seater means the pilot will be overworked for observation and surveillance duties. 

The ALCA is only used by the Czech Republic, and has not been successful in its bids to other air forces. The nearest chance it got for an export was with Iraq but it was cancelled due to budgetary issues.

5. United Aircraft (Yakolev) Yak-130 Mitten (Russia)

The Yakolev Yak-130 Mitten is another jet powered possible candidate for the OV-10 replacement. It previously competed in the LIFT/SAA program of the PAF, but is also capable of doing what the OV-10 does plus more. It was a spin-off from the joint Aermacchi-Yakolev partnership in the 1990s, and has similar physical attributes with its Italian twin, the Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master (another losing PAF LIFT/SAA program candidate). It is a two-seat aircraft, capable of being used as a lead-in fighter trainer, light combat aircraft and reconnaissance/surveillance aircraft. 


The Yakolev Yak-13 Mitten of the Russian Air Force.
Photo taken from Airliners.com.

Based on released specifications it appears that its advantage is its range and speed, but due to its high speed compared to its propeller-driven aircraft, it does lack on endurance. It has more hard points for different Russian-made ammunition, enabling it to do similar combat duties as the LIFT/SAA aircraft. 

Although it is a LIFT aircraft, its dissimilarity with the incoming KAI FA-50 Golden Eagle might be detrimental to the training program when used together. But being dissimilar means it can be used in air combat training representing an OPFOR aircraft. Being a Russian product is another disadvantage due to compatibility and dissimilarity with existing PAF and allied systems and ammunition, and lack of experience by the PAF on Russian systems. This appears to be a major reason why it was not chosen for the LIFT/SAA program. Pricing and operating costs are also quite high compare to its propeller-driven competitors, being the most expensive since it actually is closer in in capability to the FA-50.

The Mitten is used by Russia and several countries that rely on Russia for their arms requirement like Algeria. An issue brought out previously is the capability of United Aircraft to deliver according to contract schedule, wherein there are several orders from other countries like Vietnam, Syria, Bangladesh and even Russia that has not yet been fulfilled.

6. Special mention can be given to the following possible offers, but in MaxDefense' opinion may not make it to a short list should a bid happen:
     
     - Air Tractor AT-802U
     - US Aircraft A-67 Dragon
     - Boeing OV-10X Bronco


The US Aircrafts A-67 Dragon is still in prototype stage.
Photo taken from Wikimedia.

MaxDefense believes that these American aircraft models does not meet some basic requirements of the PAF / DND's bidding requirements, as all are not used by the armed forces of the manufacturer's home country, and most are either prototypes (A-67) or concepts yet (OV-10X). Currently the AT-802U is only used by the United Arab Emirates Air Force.

Press reports last year pointed to Embraer's Super Tucano as the choice for the OV-10 replacement, although this was immediately denied by the DND and PAF, saying that there is no definite choice yet. Previous revelations also appear that the source of the press report was not dependable at all. It was also expected that the bidding for this project will commence this year, but as of writing there is no schedule released by the DND yet to confirm this.

DND USec. Patrick Velez previously confirmed that the Super Tucano, Texan II, Woongbi and L-159 ALCA were in the shortlist for the "close air support aircraft" requirement.

As it is too early to say, MaxDefense will not give its preference on a specific aircraft model. Instead MaxDefense is open to comments, opinions and personal preferences on both the blog page and in our Facebook page.


====================
UPDATES:
====================
June 24, 2014:
The DND released a Supplemental Bid Bulletin, moving the bid submission and opening schedule from July 2, 2014 to July 11, 2014. No reason was provided, although it is expected that bidders are given enough time to provide reasonable and competitive bid.

MaxDefense is trying to release an update on this project in a separate blog entry, hopefully within the month. 

=====


Monday, July 8, 2013

A "New" Maestrale Frigate? Another Case of Lack of Understanding by the Press


In a Philippine Department of National Defense (DND) press conference last July 2, 2013, DND Undersecretary for Finance, Munitions, Installations and Materiel Fernando I. Manalo discussed the status of several ongoing projects including the much awaited new frigate acquisition program. While explaining what happened to a previous plan to purchase 2 used Maestrale-class frigates from Italy, he suddenly uttered the words "...instead of buying second hand we might as well buy a new Maestrale..." while continuing his explanation on the program's status.

The Italian Maestrale-class frigate. The design is already more than 30-years old, why get an old design when new, updated and fresh designs are available worldwide?
Photo taken from Wikimedia.

The next day, Philippine news reports mostly sourcing their content from the French news agency Agence France-Presse (AFP), have published headlines saying that the Philippines will be buying new Maestrale-class frigates from Italy. As one of the largest and oldest news organization with a history of reliable and wide coverage news, it was also picked-up by major foreign-based news outfits, defense and shipping-related publications and internet news, and even blogs and forums. And everything was history.


To those familiar with ship design, you could already see the big difference in technology between a 1970s warship design like the Maestrale-class here....

...and this new frigate design from the 21st century. Notice the sleek and smooth lines of the ship design that contributes to the stealthy features of the warship?

Analyzing the press conference remarks by Mr. Manalo and raw transcripts posted by TheInsider at Timawa Philippine Defense Forum (which fortunately is available online), we can see that Mr. Manalo indeed made an unintended but damaging mistake of saying "buy a new Maestrale". But looking further it appears that he actually meant "buy a new frigate". Mr. Manalo wanted to say frigate, but instead said Maestrale.

DND Undersecretary for Finance, Munitions, Installations and Materiel Fernando I. Manalo.
Photo taken from Interaksyon.com

Although it was a mistake made by Mr. Manalo, MaxDefense does not totally take it against him, rather it was also the mistake of the press. The press just simply quoted USec. Manalo, right? Wrong. Judging from the entirety of the press conference, it shows that the press was not taking into consideration what Mr. Manalo was discussing all along. Or worse, they did not understand what Mr. Manalo was talking about.


Bidding for new frigates were discussed during the press conference. Different shipbuilders like Korea's Hyundai Heavy Industries are interested in the program and is offering their Incheon-class frigate.

Early in the press conference, USec. Manalo explained that the Philippine Navy has just submitted the Acquisition Decision  Memorandum or ADM, which provides the basic information and specification to implement the two-stage bidding. It clearly means that bidding will be made, but has not yet started. He also said that the PN will recommend the services of a specialized consultant to guide the PN , probably with regards to system integration, specific technology information, and other needs of the PN Project Management Team that they may not be very familiar with. Again, there is no specialized consultant yet, but hiring is a strong possibility. These information already points out that the PN has not yet chosen any specific bidder or shipbuilding/systems contractor & integrator until that time. But the press ignored these facts (and even all other issues discussed), went straight for the juiciest part of the interview, and made news history.


New frigate designs, like Daewoo's DW3000H frigate, is available in the market. Why would the PN settle for an old and outdated design?

Also, the Maestrale-class frigates were designed in the 1970s, taking into consideration the warship technology of that time. Besides a relatively small difference in costs, what are the advantages of buying a brand-new ship using a 1970s technology to use against threats that are using 21st century ship technology? The Italian shipbuilder of the Maestrale-class, Fincantieri, have stopped building Maestrale-class ships since the mid-1980s, and are now building new generation frigates based on the latest designs. Why would Fincantieri offer an old ship design when they can offer their latest design to square-off with the latest designs from South Korea, Spain, Australia, US, etc.


Fincantieri, the Maestrale-class' builder, is now offering new designs like the MOSAIC family.
Photo taken from Orrizonte Sistemi Navali website.

So to clarify everything, MaxDefense is confident to inform everyone that the Philippine Navy will be buying brand new frigates, and will not be Maestrale-class ships. With this, we refer you back to our original blog topic posted last May on:

 "Why the Philippine Navy dropped the Maestrale-class" (http://maxdefense.blogspot.sg/2013/05/why-philippine-navy-dropped-maestrale.html), and 

"Proposed Designs Offered to the Philippine Navy Frigate Program of 2013" (http://maxdefense.blogspot.sg/2013/05/proposed-designs-offered-for-philippine.html)

For those who haven't seen or read them yet, these 2 blog topics discuss relevant information on the PN's current frigate program. 

MaxDefense suggests that the DND, especially Usec. Manalo, should be more careful in their press releases next time. DND should give importance in giving correct information, and making sure their spokespersons are very familiar with what they discuss to the press. Committing such mistakes causes misinformation of great scale when taken directly by the press, just like what happened to this Maestrale issue. The DND and AFP should also conduct defense information training to its press corps (who also make mistakes as shown in their past press releases), and invite the local press to attend similar workshops and talks. 

The press should also give more importance in analyzing their reports and transcripts, give some time for research and reconfirmation before publishing their reports. Mistakes like this happen due to lack of understanding by the press on what they are reporting, even with sufficient information already given to them. Another proposal from MaxDefense is to hire defense-oriented reporters who has enough experience in dealing with defense-related news and information. MaxDefense believes that with the current security issues in the Philippines and in the region, the press will have a lot to handle in terms of defense-related issues in the years to come.

Philippine Navy Modernization Projects

Philippine Air Force Modernization Projects