Your 1st for Philippine Defense

Austal leads Philippine Navy's OPV Acquisition Project!

SecDef Lorenzana confirms Austal is still the preferred OPV supplier for the PN

The Philippine Navy commissions its 2nd Jose Rizal-class frigate!

The Philippine Navy welcomes BRP Antonio Luna (FF-151), its newest frigate!

The Philippine Navy selects Shaldag Mk. V for Fast Attack Interdiction Craft!

The DND has awarded the FAIC-M Acquisition Project to Israel Shipyards

The Philippine Air Force wants more Black Hawk helicopters!

The Philippine Air Force asks for more Black Hawks to allow the retirement of their Bell UH-1 Huey fleet

The Philippine Army orders the Sabrah Light Tank System from Israel!

Israel's Elbit Systems was declared the winner to supply light tanks to the PA

The Philippine Air Force receives full order of Hermes 900 and Hermes 450 UAVs!

All 9 Hermes 900 and 4 Hermes 450 MALE UAVs have been received by the PAF!


Wednesday, May 6, 2020

ATAK vs Viper vs Apache: Latest Updates on the PAF's Attack Helicopter Project


With so many discussions made, and new updates coming from open sources, media and MaxDefense sources regarding the Philippine Air Force’s Attack Helicopter (Horizon 2) Acquisition Project, it is time for a new update to consolidate all these loose information into a single post that supports previous blog entries made on the project.

For those new to this topic, MaxDefense suggests reading our earlier blog posts first before proceeding, with the following links provided below to guide you through:


The top selections for the PAF's Attack Helicipter Project (from left to right): the TAI T129 ATAK, Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian, and Bell AH-1Z Viper. Credits to original sources of photos.

Philippine Air Force Technical Group Picks TAI’s T129 ATAK as its Future Attack Helicopter” – posted first on 28 November 2018

This entry first entry was an exclusive report on the PAF Technical Working Group (TWG) selecting the TAI T129 ATAK as its top choice for the Attack Helicopter acquisition project.


Purchase of T129 ATAK falls through, What’s next for the Attack Helicopter Project of the PAF?” – posted first on 29 June 2019

Due to the tensions between the US and Turkey, the T129 production was affected as the US stopped exporting US-made components for the T129 helicopter including the LHTEC engines and certain important avionics. The DND took notice of this and further negotiations with Turkey halted as it waits on what will happen.


After delays, the DND finally selects the Philippine Air Force’s next Attack Helicopter” – posted first on 31 August 2019

Despite the issues surrounding the T129 ATAK helicopter’s production, the DND decided to continue dealing with Turkey on the Attack Helicopter acquisition project. This entry discussed the decision made by the DND to still stick to the T129 ATAK. This is the basis for the current decision of the DND to continue dealing with TAI and the Turkish government.


Why the Philippine Air Force will be better-off with the Bell AH-1Z Viper for its AH needs” – posted first on 09 October 2019

With the issue on export licenses still unsettled, MaxDefense made an opinion piece on why the PAF should be better off with the Bell AH-1Z Viper rather than continuing the push with the TAI T129 ATAK.




Project Recap:

* On 4th quarter of 2018, the Philippine Air Force’s Technical Working Group (PAF TWG) for the project selected the TAI T129 ATAK attack helicopter as its primary choice.

* The Bell’s AH-1Z Viper was considered as the first alternative to the T129.


The PAF selected the T129 ATAK (above) as its primary choice, and the Bell AH-1Z (top) as its alternative.

* On 2nd quarter of 2019, issues surfaced on the ability of TAI to deliver the T129 ATAK to the PAF, as the Turkish government was caught in a political and trade spat with the US government. The US decided to halt exporting certain components of the T129 ATAK, including the LHTEC T800 turbine engines, and certain avionics systems. 

* The Turkish government objected to this and has asked the US government to reconsider its actions. By June 2019, the US has not lifted the restrictions against Turkey, and the Philippines’ DND has noticed this.

* The PAF started looking again at its options, and has decided to talk with Bell regarding their AH-1Z Viper.  This is while the DND continues its discussions with the Turkish government and TAI on final pricing and inclusions, and updates on the supply issues with the US.


PAF included the T129 as their projected future AH in this PAF Magazine released last July 2019. Photo credited to MaxDefense contributor.

* Bell’s original offer was too expensive, prompting to check with Boeing with the AH-64E Apache Guardian. 

* By August 2019, the DND and PAF still believe that the T129 ATAK remains the best option,  with Turkey promising to settle their issue by early 2020.

* Despite this, Bell and Boeing continued to market their products in anticipation that TAI will not be getting the components it needs from the US, and that the DND and PAF will need to reconsider its options.


A T129 ATAK. Photo credits to original source of photo.

Notice of Award Released in favour of TAI’s T129 ATAK:

The DND released a Notice of Award (NOA) in favour of Turkish Aerospace Industries. But both sides were unable to reach a final contract as Turkey failed to get the US government to retract its restrictions on supply of aircraft components. 


PAF officer conducting flight tests with a T129 ATAK attack helicopter in Turkey. Photo shared to MaxDefense by one of our contributor.

Despite the NOA, talks continued with other companies in case the Turkish deal fails to take-off.

Bell was able to improve its overall package for the AH-1Z Viper, and was able to commit that they could supply between 4 to 5 helicopters based on the PAF’s budget. 


USMC Bell AH-1Z Viper attack helicopters escorting Bell UH-1Y Venom utility helicopters. Credits to original source of photo.

While it has not gained much success in getting support from the PAF, Boeing was able to get the ears of officials from the General Headquarters, Armed Forces of the Philippines (GHQ-AFP), who agree that the Apache Guardian is the best option available.

The AH-64 Apache.

According to MaxDefense sources, the insistence to also get approval for AH-64E sale is in anticipation also of a potential requirement for attack helicopters for the Philippine Army, and as a back-up plan in case both the negotiations by the DND and PAF with TAI and Bell end in failure.


DND Submits Letter of Request to US, TAI Requests for Time Extension:

By early 2020, both Bell and Boeing gained some ground when the DND decided to proceed with submitted a Letter of Request (LOR) with the US State Department for the potential sale of either the Bell AH-1Z Viper and the Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian.

Meanwhile, TAI has requested the DND and PAF for changes to be made on the Implementing Arrangements of the project, to allow TAI an extra 1 year extension in delivering the Attack Helicopters compared to the original stipulated duration. 


The AH-1Z and AH-64E. Credits to original sources of photos.

MaxDefense believes that the delivery extension request was in anticipation that Turkey would get the US government to reconsider its export restrictions. 

Extending by 1 year is not enough to allow an indigenous helicopter engine development to finish, and for type certification with the T129. These processes take at least 3-5 years, and continued use of the LHTEC T800 engine remains the best option for the T129.


The T129's 20mm guns and sighting system. Photo shared to MaxDefense by a contributor.

US State Department Approves Potential Sale of AH-1Z or AH-64E:

By May 2020, the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) announced that the US State Department has approved the potential sale of both the Bell AH-1Z Viper and Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters to the Philippines, and that the US Congress has been notified about this and would make its own approval of this plan.



The DSCA notice on the potential sale of AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters to the Philippines. Photo taken from DCSA screengrab.


The notices posted by DSCA shows an idea of the inclusions made by Bell and Boeing in their packages, considering both packages differ significantly in the inclusions, affecting the overall estimated price by more than 300%.



The DSCA notice on the potential sale of AH-1Z Viper attack helicopters to the Philippines. Photo taken from DSCA screengrab.


MaxDefense posted these spreadsheets in our Facebook page to show the difference between the package inclusions, justifying why Boeing’s offer was far more expensive than the offer made by Bell.



Photo shared and credited to one of our contributor who wish to remain anonymous.


Bell AH-1Z versus Boeing AH-64E:

MaxDefense posted another set of spreadsheets comparing the Bell AH-1Z and Boeing AH-64E in terms of certain parameters. 

Data used came from and credited to Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Australia, and Scott Lovell, used for the evaluation of both models for the Australian Army’s LAND 4503 ARH Replacement Project.




Data credited to RUSI Australia/Scott Lovell, edited and complied by one of our contributor who wish to remain anonymois

Performance-wise, there are only small differences and MaxDefense has decided not to look into this anymore. Instead, we focus on more important details.

Based on the details above, MaxDefense believes that while the AH-64E Apache Guardian is considered the best attack helicopter available anywhere, the AH-1Z Viper is a better option for the PAF due to its speed, range, being navalized and corrosion resistant, lower acquisition and operating cost, and better leverage due to close relationship of the PAF with the AH-1Z’s biggest user the US Marine Corps.


PAF and USMC personnel with a USMC Bell AH-1W Super Cobra. Photo credited to origibal source.

The biggest deciding factor is the AH-1Z being navalized and corrosion resistant, which enables it to survive the high salinity  climate and environment of the Philippines that hounds military and civilian aircraft operating from our country. The AH-1Z was designed to operate from assault ships and conduct operates in coastal areas. 

Another is the price factor. Generally the AH-1Z is somehow cheaper to acquire and sustain than the AH-64E based on an apples-to-apples comparison. Price has always been a major factor in any AFP Modernization Program acquisition, and the small savings actually is a big factor seriously looked at by the PAF.

Bell's outstanding relations with the PAF is another factor, considering Bell has been actively supporting the PAF's fleet, which is mostly equipped with Bell helicopters like the UH-1D/H Huey, Bell 412HP/EP, and AH-1S Cobra.



Majority of PAF's helicopter fleet is composed of Bell helicopters like the Bell 412EP (top) and Bell AH-1S Cobra (above). Credits to original source of top photos.

Final Decision Rests on PAF Technical Team:

According to the latest statements made by Defense Sec. Delfin Lorenzana, the American helicopters are found to be expensive, and that the PAF decided to go with Turkey’s offer, and that Turkey as able to offer 6 helicopters while US companies can only offer 2 based on the PAF’s budget.

This reply from Sec. Lorenzana is simplistic, inaccurate, and could be based on old information considering Bell has been able to improve its offer. Even based on the US$450 million estimated package cost as per the DSCA notice, it shows that the offer can actually provide almost 4 helicopters, not 2 as Sec. Lorenzana mentioned.


Bell AH-1Z Viper. Credits to original source of photo.

It is good to know though the Sec. Lorenzana confirmed his knowledge on Turkey’s issues with the US-soured components, although he mentioned that “it is Turkey’s problem” is a sign of lack of pro-activeness in the defense department to cut risks in deals that they entered into.

MaxDefense believes that the PAF has the ball on making the final decision if it is going to accept TAI’s request to extend the delivery date by 1 more year, or to move to its next best alternative which is the Bell AH-1Z Viper. If the PAF decides to stick with the T129 ATAK, it is expected that the DND would just do the same. 

Even if there are powerful forces within the DND and the national government that are forcing the PAF to stick with the T129 ATAK, the PAF should show decisiveness in its decision making and must not allow itself to be pushed around.


Bell AH-1Z Viper firing AGM-114 Hellfire missile. Credits to original source of photo.

As of this writing, the PAF has not officially changed its decision, although MaxDefense has received several confirmation from PAF sources that the PAF may not wait for TAI anymore and will instead move to go with Bell's AH-1Z Viper.


PAF sources also confirmed to MaxDefense that if they decide to drop the deal with TAI, it could take another 3 to 6 months to process. Thus, MaxDefense believes that a decision should be made ASAP.


The PAF needs to strongly consider the reality that TAI is not in a good position to solve its problems, and the PAF need not be dragged down too by their problems.


The Philippine Army Watches:

The Philippine Army (PA) is actually monitoring the developments of the project, as it may indirectly affect their own decision making on plans to have Attack Helicopters of their own.

The DND should consider that in their decision making too, that’s why this project is actually more complicated than everyone expect, even those from DND may not have realized the problems that may arise if the PAF and DND makes a bad decision.



The Philippine Army is eyeing the acquisition of possibly 2 classes of attack helicopters and is looking at the PAF project closely. Photos for reference only, credited to original sources.

Deadline Looms:

Another problem is that the initial funds for the Attack Helicopter project was already subjected to a 1 year time extension by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), and project’s funds should be used before 31 December 2020. That is just less than 7 months away.

The Covid-19 pandemic makes things even more difficult due to restrictions.

Also, the delivery of the helicopters are affected by further delays in concluding a contract for the project. If a contract can only be signed by September 2020, there is a possibility that the winning company would not be able to deliver a helicopter before Pres. Duterte leaves office in June 2022.

Take note that Pres. Duterte previously mentioned that he wants to prioritize projects that can be finished within his term. At this rate, the PAF Attack Helicopter Acquisition Project may not be one of them.

The US Government Also Waits:

Another factor that remains more clarity is what the US government's participation in the project, should the PAF and DND select an American attack helicopter model.

Previously MaxDefense mentioned that Bell has an indirect advantage due to the US government's willingness to provide additional attack helicopters in the form of used and refurbished Bell AH-1W Super Cobras currently operated by the US Marine Corps.

The Bell AH-1W Super Cobra

MaxDefense's industry sources confirmed that Boeing has even made its displeasure known to the Pentagon due to Bell's advantage in such an offer, considering the Bell AH-1Z Viper is actually a direct replacement of the AH-1W Super Cobra.

This gives the Viper a better chance of getting selected should the US government provide a separate but related offer to either grant (donate) or affordably sell a squadron of AH-1W Super Cobras.


PAF pilots checking a USMC Bell AH-1W Super Cobra during joint exercises between the US and AFP. Photo taken from DVIDS hub.

Despite its age, the AH-1W Super Cobra remains far better than any attack helicopter in the Philippine Air Force, and even better than attack helicopters of several regional neighbors. These are cheap but still useful assets that the PAF is very willing to accept based on our queries with PAF pilots and officers.

MaxDefense’s Opinion:

MaxDefense does not find any fault on the TAI T129 ATAK attack helicopter’s performance and capabilities. From the start, MaxDefense supported the decision of the PAF to select the T129 ATAK because it is a capable attack helicopter, while being a cheaper alternative to American or European models.


Philippine officials visiting TAI and the T129 ATAK in 2019. Photo credited to Philippine Embassy in Turkey.

But the situation Turkey is facing with regards to obtaining the major components to manufacture the helicopter is something that is beyond the control of Turkish Aerospace Industries, and also beyond the control of the DND and PAF. The Philippine side cannot be faulted for any decision to ditch the deal with TAI because of the issues affecting the PAF's own timeframe.

MaxDefense believes that despite Turkey’s promises, it is risky to continue with the deal with TAI, and the DND should have been pro-active in checking the situation by coordinating with the US government regardimg the export restrictions to Turkey.  Being a US ally, the Philippines should get a straight answer from the US government.

In simple terms, the T129 ATAK is indeed a cheaper helicopter. But how can its cheapness benefit the country if they do not have the engines and avionics to work?

As early as October 2019, MaxDefense made its voice heard when we said the Bell AH-1Z Viper would be the best solution for the PAF and DND rather than sticking with the uncertainty of Turkey’s ability to deliver the T129 ATAK.

The PAF and DND should look at Pakistan’s decision on how to go through with its T129 ATAK orders. Take note that Pakistan signed a contract in 2018 for the supply and delivery of 30 units of T129 ATAK attack helicopters for the Pakistan Army. As of 02 May 2020, the Pakistan government was reported to have given Turkey until July 2020 to confirm its ability to meet contract obligations, or the Pakistan government will cancel the contract and ask for damage reparations for the delays incurred on their own Attack Helicopter project.


Greece's Flight and Space Magazine correspondent Babak Taghvaee reported Pakistan's warning to Turkey regarding failure to start T129 production. Photo screengrabbed from Twitter.

Despite recent political issues between the Philippines and the US including the plan to cancel the PH-US Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA), the fact remains: the US is still the Philippines’ foremost and only ally, and the country’s defense strategy hangs on the US military’s ability to support the Philippines. 

It would be beneficial for the PAF to use attack helicopters used by its allies, as it also stand to benefit on maximizing its Defense Logistics Support agreement. This enables the US to provide spare parts and supplies of similar equipment from its own logistics chain in cases of emergencies, like what happened during the Battle of Marawi when the US provided munitions from its own inventory to the AFP.

Then there is the chance to potentially acquire excess AH-1W Super Cobras.

If the information is indeed true that PAF is dropping the T129 in favor of AH-1Z is true, do it swiftly and decisively.


PAF is said to be preparing to shift its plan to the AH-1Z due to Turkish issues on component supply. Photo credited to original owner.

Project Summary:

Attack Helicopter (Horizon 2)Acquisition Project:

Note: Edited as of 05 May 2020.

* End User: Philippine Air Force (15th Strike Wing)

Quantity: no specific quantity, cost dependent


* Modernization Phase:
 Horizon 2 Phase of RAFPMP


* Project ABC:
 Php13,800,000,000.00


Acquisition Mode: Government-to-Government deal, originally with Turkish Ministry of Defense.

* Source of Funding: GAA Funds through AFP Modernization Program Trust Fund, to be paid via Multi-Year Obligation Authority (MYOA) process.


* SARO Release/s: 
TBA


* Winning Proponent: TBA


Product for Delivery: TBA


* Contract Price: TBA


* First post by MaxDefense: TBA


* MaxDefense Searching Hashtag: #PAFAHAcquisition


* Status: TWG selected TAI T129 ATAK as basis for the Attack Helicopter project in 2018. Despite re-evaluation made in 2019 after Turkey had problems obtaining US and EU-sourced subsystems, NOA awarded to Turkish Aerospace Industries although PAF is looking at either Bell AH-1Z or Boeing AH-64E as alternatives to the T129. US State Department approval was confirmed for both American helicopters.


===============
===============
First release: 06 May 2020
Copyright MaxDefense Philippines

Sunday, April 19, 2020

The PNP Special Action Force introduces Russian trucks into service


The Philippine National Police - Special Action Force (PNP-SAF), the police force's military-like special operations unit, continues to receive new equipment as it modernize and expand its force.

Among those it has focused on is the acquisition of mobility assets like trucks, which is essential for the day-to-day movement of units.

Surprisingly, these requirements has become an access for non-traditional truck models to join the PNP-SAF's fleet, which were mostly acquired through public tenders by meeting the specified requirements while being the lowest priced.

Among those non-traditional models are those from Russia, which were acquired commercially and are not covered by any CAATSA restrictions.


Conequip Philippines, based in Cebu City, as well as Gazelle Motors Corp. based in Pasig City, have spearheaded the entry of Russian trucks to the Philippine market, specifically Ural and GAZ brands. And they have been successful in selling their trucks to the Philippine government, including local government units (LGU) and the Philippine National Police.

This short blog discusses the first wave of Russian trucks in service with the PNP's Special Action Force.

Photo taken from and credited to Gazelle Motors Corp.

Multi-Purpose Search and Rescue Amphibian Vehicles:

The first Russian vehicles acquired by the PNP-SAF were not actually trucks, but more of utility vehicles that can be used for Search and Rescue (SAR). These are the RM Terex GAZ-3409 amphibious all-terrain vehicle which can be used in heavily flooded areas during Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) operations.

The vehicles are no different in size from regular vans, but these are amphibious which allows them to "swim" over water and reach difficult to reach areas.


Only 2 units were acquired by the PNP-SAF under the SAF-2017-65 Multi-Purpose SAR Amphibian Vehicle project with an ABC of Php14 million. 

The project was awarded to ConEquip Philippines Inc. on 21 December 2017, and was contracted to them under a Php14 million deal by 28 December 2017. Both vehicles were delivered to the PNP-SAF by mid-2018.



The RM Terex GAZ-3409 amphibian vehicle on display during a capability exhibit in August 2018. Photos taken from ConEquip Philippines' Facebook page, and shared in MaxDefense Philippines' post.

While MaxDefense believes that this is nothing more but an all-terrain vehicle, it is still worth looking at how it will perform during actual disasters. 

It still remains to be seen if the PNP-SAF is happy with their acquisition, although MaxDefense sources confirmed that the PNP-SAF may potentially acquire more, or even consider the larger models like the GAZ-3039 if they are satisfied with the vehicle's overall performance and value.


Medium Troop Carriers:

As the PNP-SAF required more transportation equipment to beef up its mobility fleet, it also gave more opportunity for Russian trucks to be considered.


The first one was a requirement for 10 vehicles, consisting of 8 Medium Troop Carriers and 2 Rescue Vehicles under the SAF-2018-85 Transportation Equipment Project, which has an ABC of Php30,200,000.00. Gazelle Motors Corp. won the tender with a bid amount of Php27,500,000.00, which received the contract on 28 December 2018.

Gazelle Motors delivered the GAZ Sadko 2.5-ton 4x4 utility truck, which are the first Russian trucks in PNP service. The difference between the troop carrier and rescue vehicle are on the exterior paint, as rescue vehicles are painted bright orange, while troop carriers were in camouflage. 





The first batch of GAZ Sadko 2.5-ton trucks were delivered to the PNP-SAF in mid-2019. Photos taken from Gazelle Motors Corp.'s FB page.

It appears that the GAZ Sadko competes with the German MAN CLA 18.300 2.5-ton trucks that are also in PNP and PNP-SAF service and in almost the same price bracket. While the GAZ Sadko appears to be smaller in size and are only in 4x4 (the MAN CLA has also 2 axles but twin tires at the rear), the Russian truck appears to be more off-road in nature with its lifted suspension and off-road tires.

Being in the 2.5-ton category also means that this could be Russia's answer to the Kia KM250 6x6 2.5-ton truck that is being used by the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP).

According to Gazelle Motors' replies on their Facebook page, the GAZ Sadko delivered to the PNP-SAF are 6.515 meters long, 2.7 meters wide, and has curb weight of 3,990 kilograms, and a gross vehicle weight of 6,350 kilograms.


It is powered by a 4.43L YMZ-53442 turbo-diesel engine with intercooler with Euro 4 emission standards, with a maximum power of 135hp @ 2,300rpm, and a maximum torque of 419Nm @ 1,200-2,100 rpm. It has a 5-speed manual transmission, and has dependent leaf springs suspension.

Gazelle Motors tested the GAZ Sadko in local conditions, with the video below showing an example fording a river, and going around Crow Valley in Tarlac to test its off-road capability. Video credited to Gazelle Motors Corp.





Another requirement was raised by the PNP-SAF for Medium Troop Carriers, this time under the SAF-2019-04 Medium Troop Carrier Project, calling for 37 units with an ABC of Php119,868,800.00. 

In this case, ConEquip Philippines won the tender with an bid amount of Php119,128,800.00. ConEquip Philippines received the contract on 08 April 2019, and delivered the trucks before the end of 2019.

The trucks were among those officially accepted by the PNP on 03 March 2020. While MaxDefense counts the number of trucks handed over last March was 37 trucks for the PNP-SAF, ConEquip Philippines claims that they turned over 80 trucks to the PNP. MaxDefense has not checked yet if the PNP General Headquarters also made a separate order, since the PNP-SAF has its own Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) and procurement capability separate from the PNP GHQ.


Some of the GAZ Sadko trucks handed over by Conequip Philippines to the PNP, bound for the Special Action Force. Photo taken from Conequip Philippines' Facebook page.

Heavy Troop Carriers and Command Vehicles:

Another requirement from the PNP-SAF came up in 2018, this time for larger trucks, with 6 Heavy Troop Carriers and 4 Command Vehicles under the SAF-2018-88 Transportation Equipment Project, with an ABC of Php85,600,000.00.


The specs call for trucks larger than the GAZ Sadko or MAN CLA, at around 5-ton payload capacity.

This time, Conequip Philippines again won the tender with a bid amount of Php85,575,000.00. And in this case, they decided to offer the Ural NEXT 5-ton 4x4 truck based on the Ural 43206 chassis. This is the modern version of the classic Ural 43206 truck, which is the 4x4 version of the Ural 4320.

According to a ConEquip's representative who answered MaxDefense's query, the truck are actually 4320-71. But to avoid confusion, MaxDefense decided to use the basic chassis name which is 43206.



The Ural NEXT 43206 (top) and the older Ural 43206 (above). The Ural NEXT are the new generation versions, which benefits from technology taken from their cooperation with Italy's IVECO. Photos credited to original owners.

For some reason though, MaxDefense sources confirmed that the trucks that arrived were actually for 8 Heavy Troop Carriers and 2 Command Vehicles. There could have been adjustments made internally although we are not yet privy to the arrangements.

The standard Ural NEXT 43206 heavy troop carriers arrived without rear roofing or roof framing, although it is possible that it would be installed in the Philippines before delivery to the PNP-SAF. It is no different from other troop carrying trucks of the PNP and AFP, as it has bench seating, with passengers facing each other from left and right sides.




The Ural NEXT 43206 5-ton 4x4 Heavy Troop Carriers as delivered. Photo shared exclusively to MaxDefense by source.
Meanwhile, the Command Vehicle appears to be just a shell without any communications equipment yet. This could be filled-in by the PNP-SAF after delivery and depending on the equipment they intend to install. The vehicle has a rear enclosed cabin, and although there appears to be some parts that could be armored, it still remains to be seen if the entire cabin is armored protected. It also appears that power requirements and probably airconditioning could already be in place.

Both the troop carrier and command vehicle variants came with standard police blinker lights, and screen protection on windows and lights.




The Ural 43206 Command Vehicles, which appears to be only the shell and not including communications equipment, which the SAF would install later on according to their preference. Photo exclusively shared to MaxDefense by source.

Again, the camouflage pattern seems out of sync with the PNP-SAF's standards, considering their other vehicles like the Commando Gage V-150 Commando and Shladot MDT Armor Tiger II armored vehicles, as well as other PNP-SAF vehicles sport a different color pattern that is different from those seen in these Russian-built vehicles.

Surprising though, is that the PNP preferred to use a short wheelbase 4x4 chassis rather than a short wheelbase 6x6 version of Ural NEXT called the Ural NEXT 5557, or the long wheelbase called the Ural NEXT 4320. The Ural NEXT 4320 is the direct descendant of the Ural 4320 trucks that were donated by the Russian government to the Philippine Army.

The Ural NEXT 43206 are powered by the YAMZ-53622.10 in-line turbodiesel engine with intercooler, with a maximum power of 240hp @ 2,300rpm. Kerb weight for the standard chassis 43206 model is 6,645 kilograms, and gross vehicle weight is 13,300 kilograms.


Basic info on the Ural 43206 4x4 5-ton truck. Photo screengrabbed from Ural's brochure courtesy of ConEquip Philippines Inc.



Opening New Possibilities and Opportunities:

Russian trucks are known as equally durable and reliable as their Western counterparts, probably even better than the South Korea KIA trucks the AFP uses as their standard utility vehicles. Being commercial vehicles, these are not really covered by CAATSA restrictions too. 

What MaxDefense worries is the parts supply and maintenance support. While both Gazelle Motors and ConEquip Philippines promised to make that a priority, it still remains to be seen how much they can do considering parts for the vehicles are not readily available yet in your local truck parts shops.

As for the PNP-SAF, their decision to introduce Russian trucks might have timed well by their formal introduction into the Philippine market. We'll have to wait for 3 years at least to see if these trucks are going well, or will they end up to be a bad experiment like what the PNP did when it bought utility vehicles from India's Mahindra through its local distributor who also has not much nationwide coverage.


It also remains to be seen though if the trend will continue, considering the PNP itself may also acquire medium and heavy troop carrier trucks for use by Regional Public Safety Battalions, which uses MAN CLA 18.300 and assorted Hino and Isuzu trucks acquired from earlier tenders. With GAZ and URAL appearing to be cheaper, chances are, the both Gazelle Motors and ConEquip Philippines may enter biddings and win them too.

Also, with GAZ and Ural already in service with the PNP, what are the chances that the PNP may acquire other versions of the vehicles, including larger 6x6 troop carrying or cargo trucks, tractor heads, wreckers, and other support vehicles?


The Ural NEXT 4320 6x6 in military utility vehicle variant. Credits to original source of photo.
===============

Project Summary:

Multi-Purpose SAR Amphibian Vehicle (SAF-2017-65) Acquisition Project

Note: Edited as of 18 April 2020.


* End User: Philippine National Police (Special Action Force)

* Quantity: 2 Tracked All-Terrain Amphibious Vehicles


* Project ABC: Php14,000,000.00
     
Acquisition Mode: Public Bidding

* Source of Funding: PNP GAA 2017


* Winning Proponent: ConEqup Philippines Inc.

Product for Delivery:
      - 2 units RM Terex GAZ-3409 small tracked all-terrain amphibious vehicles


* Contract Price: 
Php14,000,000.00

* First post by MaxDefense: 05 August 2018


* MaxDefense Searching Hashtag: #PNPSAF201765

* Status: NOA released in favor of ConEqup Philippines Inc. on 21 December 2017, Contract signed and NTP released on 26 December 2017. Delivered to the PNP-SAF as of mid-2018.



===============

Transportation Equipment (SAF-2018-85) Acquisition Project

Note: Edited as of 18 April 2020.


* End User: Philippine National Police (Special Action Force)

* Quantity: 6 Medium Troop Carriers, 2 Rescue Vehicles


* Project ABC: Php30,200,000.00
     
Acquisition Mode: Public Bidding

* Source of Funding: PNP GAA 2018


* Winning Proponent: Gazelle Motors Corp.

Product for Delivery:
      - 8 units GAZ Sadko 4x4 2.5-ton trucks in Troop Carrier configuration

      - 2 units GAZ Sadko 4x4 2.5-ton trucks in Rescue Vehicle configuration

* Contract Price: 
Php27,500,000.00


* First post by MaxDefense: 


* MaxDefense Searching Hashtag: #PNPSAF201885


* Status: NOA released in favor of Gazelle Motors Corp. on 21 December 2018, Contract signed and NTP released on 28 December 2018. Delivered to the PNP-SAF as of mid-2019.


===============

Transportation Equipment (SAF-2018-88) Acquisition Project

Note: Edited as of 18 April 2020.


* End User: Philippine National Police (Special Action Force)

* Quantity: 6 Heavy Troop Carriers, 4 Command Vehicles (changed later to 8 Heavy Troop Carriers, 2 Command Vehicles)


* Project ABC: Php85,600,000.00
     
Acquisition Mode: Public Bidding

* Source of Funding: PNP GAA 2018


* Winning Proponent: ConEquip Philippines Inc.

Product for Delivery:
      - 8 units Ural NEXT 43206 4x4 5.5-ton trucks in Troop Carrier configuration

      - 2 units Ural NEXT 43206 4x4 5.5-ton trucks in Command Vehicle configuration

* Contract Price: 
Php85,575,000.00


* First post by MaxDefense: 15 April 2020


* MaxDefense Searching Hashtag: #PNPSAF201885


* Status: NOA released in favor of ConEquip Philippines Inc.. on 03 December 2018, Contract signed and NTP released on 05 December 2018. For delivery to the PNP-SAF by April 2020.


===============

Medium Troop Carrier (SAF-2019-04) Acquisition Project

Note: Edited as of 18 April 2020.


* End User: Philippine National Police (Special Action Force)

* Quantity: 37 Medium Troop Carriers


* Project ABC: Php30,200,000.00
     
Acquisition Mode: Public Bidding

* Source of Funding: PNP GAA 2019


* Winning Proponent: ConEquip Philippines Inc.

Product for Delivery:
      - 37 units GAZ Sadko 4x4 2.5-ton trucks in Troop Carrier configuration


* Contract Price: Php119,128.800.00

* MaxDefense Searching Hashtag: #PNPSAF201904



* Status: Contract signed and NTP released in favor of ConEquip Philippines Inc. on 08 April 2019. Delivered to the PNP-SAF as of early 2020, officially presented by the PNP on March 2020. In service with the PNP-SAF.



===============
===============
First posted and released on 19 April 2020
Copyright MaxDefense Philippines





Philippine Navy Modernization Projects

Philippine Air Force Modernization Projects