According to very credible sources involved in the project, the
Philippine Navy recently released a Request for Information (RFI) for 6 Fast
Attack Crafts to equip the Littoral Combat Force,
Philippine Fleet. This is to fulfill a partial requirement under the
Philippine Navy’s Capability Upgrade Program's Horizon 2 phase.
Despite
bring a Horizon 2 project, it is now being front-loaded for early processing
rather than wait until 2018 due to the prerogatives of new Philippine president, Rodrigo Roa Duterte, in beefing up the capabilities to fight
internal threats like insurgency, terrorism, and drug shipments as part of his
overall security plan.
Background:
In
simplistic terms, the Philippine Navy describe Fast Attack Crafts as small,
heavily armed boats, with sufficient sensor capability to detect targets from a
distance, and can run at high speeds sufficient enough to catch up and
intercept other fast craft threats.
Among the
missions it is expected to do is to intercept terrorists and kidnappers moving
along the porous borders of the Philippines with Malaysia and Indonesia, and
terrorists moving along the scattered islands within the country to escape
military assaults or conduct localized kidnappings, intercept smugglers especially
those carrying weapons for terrorist or insurgent groups and illegal substances
like drugs.
The fast
attack crafts are also designed to conduct standard naval operations in support
of territorial defense, including naval patrols, and surface combat against opposing
naval surface threats if necessary.
Based on
previous Capability Upgrade Program acquisition plans of the Philippine Navy,
the requirement for fast attack crafts stemmed out from the need for Patrol
Gunboats, which later on were adjusted to a fleet of Multi-Purpose Attack
Crafts (MPAC) armed with missiles and guns.
Shortcomings
of the MPAC?:
MaxDefense
was expecting early on, that when the Philippine Navy decided to use the MPAC as
a littoral interdictor and patrol boat, it would encounter problems because the MPAC was not purpose built to be a coastal interdictor and patrol craft. The MPAC was designed
as a fast insertion boat for special operation forces or marine troops, lightly
armed for self defense and fire support of landing or retreating troops, and
fast and small enough to compensate for
stealth.
MaxDefense
found out that the Philippine Navy encountered some issues regarding the use of
MPAC design for interdiction and patrol duties when problems came out on the latest
MPAC acquisition project for the Mark 3 version. This variant is larger, heavier, and
better armed than the previous MPACs (locally called the Mark 1 and Mark 2
variants).
It was probably
found out that the current MPAC design is too small to accommodate enough space
to mount heavier weapons, and to provide enough power to the automated and
electronic weapons systems that are used to mount the guns and missiles. It is
also possible that the current design is maxed-out to meet the standard
requirements of the boat to reach the desired speed, endurance, and capability
to meet the required operations at Sea State 5 without degradation of subsystem
operations.
Lack of
space also means that the MPAC will have less space for crew quarters and
supplies, ammunition storage, fuel, and movement space. It also means that the
boat is heavier and possibly will have a reduced speed compared to its lightly
armed sister-ships, thus will need a more powerful engine that is also
physically larger.
MaxDefense
also received information that the Philippine Navy plans to use the armed MPACs
to slip inside the well deck of the Tarlac-class landing platform
dock or any future LPD and any other amphibious assault ships of the fleet. This means the
MPAC must retain its size, reduce its mast height (or adjust accordingly), and
maintain a certain weight limit for safe carriage on the well deck’s platform
during transit.
These
issues are probably considered by the Philippine Navy, resulting to the
formulation of a need for larger, purpose built fast attack crafts for
interdiction and coastal patrol duties, with a larger size and enough space,
speed, and endurance than the MPAC.
The Current
PROPOSAL:
So far, the
Philippine Navy appears to have only made a Request for Information to Israel Shipyards, based in Haifa, Israel.
Israel
Shipyards, with the assistance of the Israel Ministry of Defense, proposed
their SHALDAG MK. V fast patrol boat to the Philippine Navy. The Mk. V, which
is currently the Shaldag family’s largest variant, is almost the same size as
the Philippine Navy’s own Andrada-class patrol gunboats, but is faster and is
proven to carry more weapons than the PN’s almost 30-year old US-designed boats.
More on the
boat’s dimensions and technical information can be found on the link provided
HERE:
The
proposed Philippine Navy variant of the Shaldag Mk. V is expected to be armed
with a stabilized remote weapons station for a 25mm gun, and small
surface-to-surface missiles which MaxDefense expects to be the Spike family due
to the PN’s recent order of Spike-ER missiles for the MPAC Mk. 3. Other future
small anti-ship missiles could also be considered in the future. Manually-operated
machine guns are also expected.
It is also
expected to be fitted with a navigation & surface search radar, and an
electro-optical fire control system, probably similar to those already in use
in existing Philippine Navy ships. Space for a rigid-hull inflatable boat
(RHIB) is also available, and is expected considering the PN’s existing patrol
boat fit.
Included in
the offer from Israel Shipyard are an Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) for
the boats for a specific number of years, and a Transfer of Technology (ToT) clause
which allows the Philippine Navy’s own Naval Yard to construct their own fast
attack crafts based on Israel Shipyard’s own technology, including additional
units the Shaldag Mk. V. MaxDefense believes that it is possible that some of
the boats included in the 6 units could be built by the Philippine Navy in their Naval Yard in Cavite.
Considering the price difference between the MPAC and the Shaldag Mk. V, MaxDefense expects that other avenues will be
considered by the Philippine Navy, including mixing both types into a "high-low", or a "high-mid-low" mix, with MPACs expected to bear the higher
percentage of the expected 30-boat acquisition as the “low” tier of the
force mixture, while the Shaldags could be considered the “high” level.
The Transfer of Technology clause on the proposal also means that the Philippine Navy is expected to build more of the type in the future, and this does not make sense if the PN does not make maximize the use of this deal inclusion.
Future Proposals Expected:
Aside from
Israel Shipyards, MaxDefense believes that another Israeli shipbuilder, IAI-Ramta,
would probably make a move to submit their own proposals with their Super Dvora series of fast
patrol boats to the Philippine Navy. Although MaxDefense sources confirmed
that the Shaldag is currently the favourite of the officers within the Littoral Combat Force to
meet their requirements. The Super Dvora is considered smaller than the Shaldag Mk. V and could slot in somewhere between the middle of the two types, although Israel Shipyards also have smaller Shaldag designs, like their Mk. III and Mk. IV series, that could be counter offered should IAI-Ramta do offer their products.
It is also
expected that countries with existing Defense Cooperation Agreement with the
Philippines will submit their formal offers to the Philippine Navy as well,
like those from the US, Korea, Indonesia, Australia, and others, although there is no indication yet that such
was already made except for the one submitted by Israel Shipyards as of this posting.
It is possible that other offers would be made by other shipyards, like the Mk. VI patrol boat used by the US Navy and made by SAFE Boats International. But that remains to be seen. |
IMPORTANT NOTE TO MAXDEFENSE READERS:
MaxDefense reminds its readers that this is just an offer made by a single shipyard based on an RFI, and does not correspond to any purchase.
MaxDefense will provide more information once they become available, especially if the Philippine Navy decides to move closer to an actual acquisition deal rather than just consider an proposal.
How about the pricing? Will it fit the budget.
ReplyDeleteSebastian is not first?
ReplyDeleteginoginoako
Nope. Not this time, been busy lately. Maybe in the next blog.
DeleteSebastian.
The AFP should visit the Israeli shipyard soonest. Israel technology is superb and reliable with regards to these naval defense requirements of the AFP. Max tell your mule in the AFP that they should include the drones especially the PROTECTORS which could enable the Navy monitor or patrol a maritime area by remote control.
ReplyDeleteI hope that this would push through and finally our Armed Forces are making steps to go to the missile age. A pity because the Philippines is the last to do so. Why? Because there is a business in local insurgentcy and those corrupt PMAyer's always knew that. And the want to maintain the status quo for them to earn their retirement at the cost of our soldiers lives. They sell brand new AK 47 purchased by camp aguinaldo to npa, a full werehouse of ammo from fort bonifacio when the AFP take camp abubakar are just examples. They don't just want to have our Armed Forces to have and upperhand.That is why you can never see a country equipped with modern missile has this kind of antiquated problem. May those corrupt officials burn in hell.
ReplyDeleteSir max, why wouldn't the government make use of the shipbuilding companies here in the philippines?? mostly those who had enough experiences in shipbuilding, with some help from foreign companies, we can be self sufficient in manufacturing indigenous warships someday.
ReplyDeleteSir Max, I am also very curious why the Philippine government does not acquire licenses to manufacture equipment locally.
DeleteThe Philippines is supposed to be the world's 4th largest shipbuilding country, as per gross tonnage. The Philippines' unemployment is also the highest in the region.
Yet much of what the government procures seem to be made overseas, sending precious dollars and creating jobs in Indonesia (Tarlac/Makassar-class LPDs), India (Karmota-class frigates), South Korea (T/A-50 lead-in fighter trainers).
Hopefully, the Philippines can negotiate more offset agreements that will include tech transfer, local co-production and even perhaps licensed exportation.
Thank you very much.
Mat E
Blacktown NSW
Anonymous, may I reply to the question posed to Max. (Disclaimer, I am not a military officer, nor expert in ship building, What I know is from my various research and readings of defense equipment from various online sources.)
DeleteMy Answer:
The government will probably build local MPACS(they are already doing it with the help of local ship builders, but with simple weapons systems.) with the transfer of technology when the Philippines will purchase those fast attack crafts from Israel. The reason why we can't yet build our own because it will take years or decades of research in providing a weapon system for such small crafts, the sensors and the radar capabilities. In short, we do not have our own technology to mount advance weapons for the patrol boats. Building a ship here? That's for sure is possible, but what we are lacking is the technology, that is why we need first to purchase, those boats and acquire a license in the process to use their technology. Creating our own techs will take time like 10 years or more.
Not necessarily true. it is mainly investment return that drives these activities. There a quite a number of system provider / integrator that can work with shipbuilder. if a company spend money for R&D there better be return. That is where the government comes in. The procurement law states that whatever we buy should be in current use of a number of countries. From that condition alone, PHL shipbuilder lose already. Same thing with small arms. The best we can do is to have a deal of technology transfer like for example if we buy 10, 2 will be built in the supplier's country. The rest shall be built with some sort of joint venture by local supplier(s).
Deleteha! ha! want total transfer of technology, cheap, build everything yourself, and fast delivery. what shipbuilder will give away everything for peanuts.
ReplyDeleteThey're called offset agreements, Einstein.
DeleteIndia has been doing this for decades and have used it to help them overtake the Philippine economy while allowing them to manufacture their own Su-30s, Brahmos missiles and co-develop Russia's FA-50 stealth fighter. The Philippine Navy's next frigates will most likely be made in India, providing hundreds if not thousands of jobs to Indians.
Like India, the Philippines should have laws to always include offset agreements when negotiating with foreign defense suppliers.
Sir Max, I hope you don't mind if I include links below, to websites that have some more info regarding offset agreements, for those who are interested to learn more:
http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=offset%20agreement
http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/defense-offsets-from-contractual-burden-to-competitive-weapon
http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/new-offset-rules-allow-technology-transfer-relax-time-limits-112080302018_1.html
http://www.idsa.in/jds/3_1_2009_LeveragingDefenceOffsetPolicyforTechnologyAcquisition
http://saab.com/id/region/saab-czech-republic/about-saab/company-profile/industrial-cooperation/industrial-cooperation-programme/
http://saab.com/air/gripen-fighter-system/gripen/gripen/partnership/
Not only will the AFP benefit greatly from offset agreements, but also the Philippine economy as a whole, creating more jobs and thus, increasing government revenue for improved services to the population.
Thank you very much.
Mat E
Blacktown NSW
Phils. Government MUST consider also fast attack craft from NORWAY. Why is because this country is also known in SHIPBUILDING. the engine used is MTU and this company has its own office in Philippines. Not hard to maintain! Until now their OLD MODEL of Fast Craft still use to hunt Russian SUBS. Government can propose into Government to Government deal in Norway!
ReplyDeleteThe problem with Norway is that we have different climate than them.. Norway seas are calmer than ours..
Deletehope this will help stoping ASG in crossboundary terrorism..
ReplyDelete1L...
Can these MPACs be armed with torpedoes, too? With all the technologies available today,can they be as effective as compared to the PT Boats against Japanese ships during WWII?
ReplyDeleteCan these MPACs be armed with torpedoes, too? With all the technologies available today, can they be as effective as the PT Boats against Japanese ships during WWII?
ReplyDeletei hope from now on whether navy or air force their equipment will all have missiles.
ReplyDeleteMr. Max, How much is the price per boat and what is it's Technical Specifications?
ReplyDeleteThis is a clear understanding of what the requirements the PN needs in its littoral fleet warfare . The MPAC series although has its advantage in speed and maneuverability has its Achilles heel on its limited size and load space for major armaments and electronics upgrades not even considering for crew support . Although limited to coastal patrol and interdiction missions it will need several strategically located base of operation to have a better scope of coverage to maximize its capabilities and range . Considering all of these factors , this is where the Shaldag Mk V comes in the picture . One of the major factor that would provide a better layer of mission coverage when mixed with the propose FAC MPACS is its size and its capabilities for the type of mission the PN needs . I'm always marveled and have high respects with the Israel defense industry for developing cost effective and mission capable defense equipments. There are several designs that could be adapted to the type of mission the PN needs in combatting these lawless elements in the southern waters . With the upcoming Horizon 2 requirements it would be best to develop other venues with the government of Israel for a better way to get more informations for other much needed defense contract for the AFP . This actually will give us a wider options and "Bang for the Bucks " defense deals other than US sourced equipments without making major changes in their equipments commonality .
ReplyDeletehi sir max, down ata page mo sa facebook?
ReplyDeleteWith these series of acquisition, do the defense and security studied very well our layered of credible defense vis-a-vis with materiel acquisition and its sustainment. The SSV and our other capital ship right now has no permanent basing as a garage for maintenance in case of eventuality. With our defense and security acquisition is lean towards beyond the 2030 threats. Warfare technologies now a days is fast changing this is the reason the capability and capacity we are acquiring must be upgradeable specially its architectural integration to secured C4I. I have seen our procurement process I think the waterloo in the future is the Joint Operation from Strategic-Operaitonal-Tactical vis-a-vis its logistical sustainment from personnel development and enhancement to logistical capacity to sustain it. I suggest to upgrade the Naval Sea Systems Command shipyard capability and capacity to inlcude the area in Subic and somehere in Central Luzon or Palawan Area. Lesson learned from orld War 2 and from present and furure threats must be taken into account. Defense and Security of our country is very complex in nature. Technically speaking to sustain it in case of war up to depot level of maintenance and repair what must be done.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, there would be a thourough study why we need a lot of small attack crafts? Wherein such capability can be crippled by unmanned AAV with missiles and precision guided munitions. Our enemy would not hit us near but they will hit us afar. If we really want to have a multiple attack crafts starts to fortify our island where they could "hide and seek". Putting them in an open ship yard is a dooms day. In World War 2, the mosquito fleets where not be able to sustain its capability to cripple the enemy ships vis-a-vis the small submarines staioned at Fort San Felipe at that time. We need an integrated battle network from land, air and sea. With our acqusition it seems we are neglecting our Air-Sea superiority with longer strikes capability and capacity integrated with our C4ISR for Joint Operation in COP.
ReplyDeleteJust for thought:
ReplyDeleteThe most complex warship ever to be assembled in Indonesia has successfully completed its sea trials
The completion of trials can be seen as a validation of Indonesia's ability to assemble more sophisticated warships beyond small surface combatants and support ships
The first SIGMA 10514 Perusak Kawal Rudal (PKR) guided-missile frigate on order for the Indonesian Navy (Tentara Nasional Indonesia - Angkatan Laut, or TNI-AL) has completed sea trials and is on track to meet its delivery schedule, shipbuilder Damen announced on 13 September.
The vessel, which will be the future KRI Raden Eddy Martadinata with pennant number 331, is one of two SIGMA 10514 frigates being jointly constructed by Damen and Indonesian state-owned shipbuilder PT PAL.
Raden Eddy Martadinata first underwent seven days of basin trials at PT PAL's facilities in Surabaya to ensure that its propulsion and safety systems were fully operational prior to its shakedown cruise.
This was then followed by a passage from Surabaya to the Java Sea where the ship underwent sea trials that included tests of its weapon, radar, and sonar systems while underway, said Damen.
"The trials were successful with almost all the systems passing their assessments first time around", the company said, adding that certain parts of the ship, such as the accommodation, will still require minor modifications that will be undertaken towards the end of September 2016.
The 105 m platform features a standard displacement of approximately 2,400 tonnes, and can accommodate a crew of 120. The vessel has a top speed of 28 kt, a maximum range of 5,000 n miles at 14 kt, and a standard range of 4,000 n miles at 18 kt.
Raden Eddy Martadinata has been configured for anti-surface, anti-submarine, and anti-air missions with a suite of weapons that include launchers for MBDA MM40 Exocet Block II anti-ship missiles, six (two triple) Eurotorp B515 torpedo launchers, and a 12-cell vertical launch system that can deploy the MBDA VL-MICA surface-to-air missiles.